Sunday, January 25, 2009
Review of Suicide Malpractice Case in New York
Hesitation to sign a safety contract is not a reason to restrict a patient, as a standard of care.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
No suicide malpractice claim has justification in science, nor in law, nor in public policy.
Search This Blog
Labels
- Ange (1)
- Anti-depressants (1)
- Assisted Suicide (2)
- Bullying (6)
- Causes (1)
- Celebrities (5)
- College (3)
- Contagion (8)
- Cross Claims (1)
- Dangerous Suicider (2)
- Defense Lawyer (3)
- Defenses (10)
- Depression (1)
- Enhance the Defense (5)
- Evidence (14)
- Experts (5)
- Family (8)
- FDA (17)
- First Amendment (1)
- Guidelines (2)
- Homosexuality (1)
- Hospital Suicide (6)
- Inpatient Suicide (1)
- Internet (2)
- Jail Suicide (10)
- Justified (5)
- Lethal Lawyer Rent Seeking (3)
- Mass Murder (5)
- Methods (6)
- Murder-Suicide (8)
- Nancy Grace (3)
- Neurontin (1)
- Note (1)
- PC (1)
- Plaintiff (13)
- Plaintiff Expert (9)
- Plaintiff Lawyer (6)
- Prevention (22)
- Risk Factors (86)
- Scapegoating (1)
- Skip Simpson (1)
- Stress (4)
- Substance Abuse (1)
- Suicide Assessment (1)
- Survivors (3)
- Terrorism (1)
- Tranqulizers (1)
- Treatment (2)
- Verdict (1)
- What Works (12)
The Mission of Suicide Malpractice Blog
To end lawsuits for suicide because they contradict the modern, multi-factorial understanding of the causes of suicide, and indirectly hurt many unseen patients. The sole claim for suicide with merit involves assisting the suicide in violation of law.
This site is for defendants and defense lawyers in suicide malpractice suits, to improve defense expert testimony, perhaps to reduce losses in adverse settlements or verdicts.
These settlements and judgments devastate the practice of psychiatry. They cause the needless incarceration of thousands of suicidal patients without proof of benefit. The resulting defensive treatments consume a large fraction of the budget for wasteful treatment and starve proven preventive measures. These lawsuits are also morally wrong. They extort money from the party least influential in the many factors causing the suicide of the victim, the clinician trying to help. If they continue, the most suicidal and neediest patients will be avoided.
Explaining modern, multi-factorial understanding of the causes of suicide in plain language may result in more common sense judgments from jurors. The defendant may also prosecute, with licensing boards and in court, attorneys promulgating "junk science." The frivolous, malpractice lawsuit, because of profound, indirect impact on medical costs and life threatening errors, is another serious ethical lapse.
In systems closed to attorneys (e.g. the military), the rate of suicide may be cut by a large fraction reliably, quickly, at almost no additional expense.
About Me
- Suicide Malpractice
- A psychiatrist runs this site. It gives moral support to the civil defendant's determination to defend clinical care from vicious lawyer predators and their misleading expert collaborators.
No comments:
Post a Comment